|
e-Medical
Note: |
|
The family Filoviridae
comprises two antigenically and genetically distinct
viruses: Ebola & Marburg virus.
Ebola virus has four
readily distinguishable subtypes named for their original
site of recognition: Zaire, Sudan, Cote d'Ivoire and
Reston.
Except for Ebola virus
subtype Reston, all the Filoviridae are African viruses
that cause severe and often fatal disease in humans.
The Reston virus, which
has been exported from the Philippines on several
occasions, has caused fatal infections in monkeys but only
subclinical infections in humans.
Different isolates of
the four Ebola subtypes made over time and space exhibit
remarkable sequence conservation, indicating marked
genetic stability in their selective niche.
Typical filovirus
particles contain a single linear, negative-sense,
single-stranded RNA arranged in a helical nucleocapsid.
The virions are 790 to 970 nm in length; they may also
appear in elongated, contorted forms. The lipid envelope
confers sensitivity to lipid solvents and common
detergents.
The viruses are largely
destroyed by heat (60°C, 30 min) and by acidity but may
persist for weeks in blood at room temperature. The
surface glycoprotein self-associates to form the virion
surface spikes which presumably mediate attachment to
cells and fusion. The glycoprotein's high sugar content
may contribute to its low capacity to elicit neutralizing
antibodies. A smaller form of the glycoprotein, bearing
many of its antigenic determinants, is produced by in
vitro-infected cells and is found in the circulation in
human disease; it has been speculated that this
circulating soluble protein may suppress the immune
response to the virion surface protein or block antiviral
effector mechanisms.
Both Marburg virus and
Ebola virus are biosafety level 4 pathogens because of
their high associated mortality rate and aerosol
infectivity.
|
Definition
Both Marburg virus and Ebola virus cause an acute
febrile illness associated with high mortality. This illness is
characterized by multisystem involvement that begins with the abrupt
onset of headache, myalgias, and fever and proceeds to prostration,
rash, shock, and often bleeding manifestations. Epidemics usually begin
with a single case acquired from an unknown reservoir in nature and
spread mainly through close contact with sick persons or their body
fluids, either in the home or at the hospital.
Epidemiology
Marburg virus was first identified in Germany in 1967
when infected African green monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) imported
from Uganda transmitted the agent to vaccine-laboratory workers. Of the
25 human cases acquired from monkeys, 7 ended in death. The six
secondary cases were associated with close contact or parenteral
exposure. Secondary spread to the wife of one patient was documented,
and virus was isolated from the husband's semen despite the presence of
circulating antibodies. Subsequently, isolated cases of Marburg virus
infection have been reported from eastern and southern Africa, with
limited spread.
In 1999, repeated transmission of Marburg virus to
workers in a gold mine in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo was
documented. The secondary spread of the virus among patients' families
was more extensive than previously noted, resembling that of Ebola virus
and emphasizing the importance of hygiene and proper barrier nursing in
the epidemiology of these viruses in Africa.
In 1976, epidemics of severe hemorrhagic fever (550
human cases) occurred simultaneously in Zaire and Sudan, and Ebola virus
was found to be the etiologic agent. Later, it was shown that different
subtypes of virus-associated with 90% and 50% mortality,
respectively-caused the two epidemics. Both epidemics were associated
with interhuman spread (particularly in the hospital setting) and the
use of unsterilized needles and syringes, a common practice in
developing-country hospitals. The epidemics dwindled as the clinics were
closed and people in the endemic area increasingly shunned affected
persons and avoided traditional burial practices.
The Zaire subtype of Ebola virus recurred in a major
epidemic (317 cases, 88% mortality) in Democratic Republic of Congo in
1995 and in smaller epidemics in Gabon in 1994-1996. Mortality was high,
transmission to caregivers and others who had direct contact with body
fluids was common, and poor hygiene in hospitals exacerbated spread. In
the Congo epidemic, an index case was infected in Kikwit in January
1995. The epidemic smoldered until April, when intense nosocomial
transmission forced closure of the hospitals; samples were finally sent
to the laboratory for Ebola testing, which yielded positive results
within a few hours. International assistance, with barrier nursing
instruction and materials, was provided; nosocomial transmission ceased,
hospitals reopened, and patients were segregated to prevent
intrafamilial spread. The last case was reported in June 1995.
Three separate emergences of Ebola virus (subtype
Zaire) were detected in Gabon from 1994 through 1996, all associated
with deep forest exposure and subsequent familial and nosocomial
transmission. In the 1996 episode, a physician exposed to Ebola-infected
patients traveled to South Africa with a fever; a nurse who assisted in
a cutdown on the physician developed Ebola hemorrhagic fever and died in
spite of intensive care. The index patient was identified
retrospectively on the basis of serum antibodies and virus isolation
from semen. Thus, distant transport of Ebola virus is an established
risk, and limited nosocomial spread is possible even under hygienic
conditions.
The Reston subtype of Ebola virus was first seen in
the United States in 1989, when it caused a fatal, highly transmissible
disease among cynomolgus macaques imported from the Philippines and
quarantined in Reston, VA, pending distribution to biomedical
researchers. This and other appearances of the Reston virus have been
traced to a single export facility in the Philippines, but no source in
nature has been established.
Epidemiologic studies (including a specific search in
the Kikwit epidemic) have failed to yield evidence for an important role
of airborne particles in human disease. This lack of epidemiologic
evidence is surprising and seems to conflict with the viruses'
classification as biosafety level 4 pathogens based in part on their
aerosol infectivity and with formal laboratory assessments showing a
high degree of aerosol infectivity for monkeys. Sick humans apparently
do not usually generate sufficient amounts of infectious aerosols to
pose a significant hazard to those around them.
Available evidence points to a
nonprimate reservoir
for these viruses, but an intensive search has failed to elucidate what
this reservoir might be. Speculation has centered on a possible role for
bats, but that hypothesis has arisen in part merely because of the
ubiquity of bats when sought in affected areas and the frustration of
researchers in identifying a source of virus.
Pathology and Pathogenesis
In humans and in animal models, Ebola and Marburg
viruses replicate well in virtually all cell types, including
endothelial cells, macrophages, and parenchymal cells of multiple
organs. Viral replication is associated with cellular necrosis both in
vivo and in vitro. Significant findings at the light-microscopic level
include liver necrosis with Councilman bodies (intracellular inclusions
that correlate with extensive collections of viral nucleocapsids),
interstitial pneumonitis, cerebral glial nodules, and small infarcts.
Antigen and virions are abundant in fibroblasts, interstitium, and (to a
lesser extent) the appendages of the subcutaneous tissues in fatal
cases; escape through small breaks in the skin or possibly through sweat
glands may occur and, if so, may be correlated with the established
epidemiologic risk of close contact with patients and the touching of
the deceased. Inflammatory cells are not prominent, even in necrotic
areas.
In addition to sustaining direct damage from viral
infection, patients infected with Ebola virus (Zaire subtype) have high
circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines, which presumably
contribute to the severity of the illness. In fact, the virus interacts
intimately with the cellular cytokine system. It is resistant to the
antiviral effects of interferon , although this mediator is amply
induced. Viral infection of endothelial cells selectively inhibits the
expression of MHC class I molecules and blocks the induction of several
genes by the interferons. In addition, glycoprotein expression inhibits
V integrin expression, an effect that has been shown in vitro to lead to
detachment and subsequent death of endothelial cells.
Acute infection is associated with high levels of
circulating virus and viral antigen. Clinical improvement takes place
when viral titers decrease concomitantly with the onset of a
virus-specific immune response, as detected by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or fluorescent antibody test. In fatal
cases, there is usually little evidence of an antibody response and
there is extensive depletion of spleen and lymph nodes. Recovery is
apparently mediated by the cellular immune response: convalescent-phase
plasma has little in vitro virus-neutralizing capacity and is not
protective in passive transfer experiments in monkey and guinea pig
models.
Clinical Manifestations
After an incubation period of ~7 to 10 days (range, 3
to 16 days), the patient abruptly develops fever, severe headache,
malaise, myalgia, nausea, and vomiting. Continued fever is joined by
diarrhea (often severe), chest pain (accompanied by cough), prostration,
and depressed mentation. In light-skinned patients (and less often in
blacks), a maculopapular rash appears around day 5 to 7 and is followed
by desquamation. Bleeding may begin about this time and is apparent from
any mucosal site and into the skin. In some epidemics, fewer than half
of patients have had overt bleeding, and this manifestation has been
absent even in some fatal cases. Additional findings include edema of
the face, neck, and/or scrotum; hepatomegaly; flushing; conjunctival
injection; and pharyngitis. Around 10 to 12 days after the onset of
disease, the sustained fever may break, with improvement and eventual
recovery of the patient. Recrudescence of fever may be associated with
secondary bacterial infections or possibly with localized virus
persistence. Late hepatitis, uveitis, and orchitis have been reported,
with isolation of virus from semen or detection of polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) products in vaginal secretions for several weeks.
Laboratory Findings
-
Leukopenia is common early
on
-
Neutrophilia has its
onset later.
-
Platelet counts fall below (sometimes much below) 50,000/L.
-
Laboratory evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation may be
found but its clinical significance and the need for therapy are
controversial.
-
Serum levels of alanine and aspartate aminotransferases
(particularly the latter) rise progressively
-
And jaundice develops in
some cases.
-
The serum amylase level may be
elevated and this elevation
may be associated with abdominal pain suggesting pancreatitis.
-
Proteinuria is usual and decreased kidney function is proportional to
shock.
Diagnosis
Most patients acutely ill with Ebola or Marburg
viruses have high concentrations of virus in blood. Antigen-detection
ELISA is a sensitive, robust diagnostic modality. Virus isolation and
reverse transcriptase PCR are also effective and provide additional
sensitivity in some cases. Patients who are recovering develop IgM and
IgG antibodies that are best detected by ELISA but are also reactive in
the less specific fluorescent antibody test. Skin biopsies are an
extremely useful adjunct in postmortem diagnosis of Ebola and, to a
lesser extent, Marburg virus infections because of the presence of large
amounts of viral antigen, the relative safety of obtaining the sample,
and the freedom from cold-chain requirements for formalin-fixed tissues.
Treatment
No virus-specific therapy is available, and, given
the extensive viral involvement in fatal cases, supportive treatment may
not be as useful as was once hoped. Vigorous treatment of shock should
take into account the likelihood of vascular leak in the pulmonary and
systemic circulation and of myocardial functional compromise. The
membrane fusion mechanism of Ebola resembles that of retroviruses, and
the identification of "fusogenic" sequences suggests that
inhibitors of cell entry may be developed. Despite the poor neutralizing
capacity of polyclonal convalescent-phase sera, phage display of
immunoglobulin mRNA from convalescent bone marrow has produced
monoclonal antibodies that have in vitro neutralizing capacity and
mediate protection in guinea pig models.
Prevention
No vaccine is available, but barrier nursing
precautions in African hospitals can greatly decrease the spread of the
virus beyond the index case and thus prevent epidemics of filoviruses
and other agents as well.
|